Friday 26 April 2013

Revision points for Language change



CAXTON’S PRINTING PRESS 1476
Upper case and lower case characters came from the position they were on the board before they were took out to print. Printing press inspired the pursuit of globalization and helped make our language a global language. “Because he couldn’t hope to print in all of the different dialect from geographical locations, he was the driving force of standardization” – Stephen Fry.

DAVID CRYSTAL ‘LINGUISTIC ECONOMY’
Older newspapers had more language with more complicated syntax and low frequency lexis, whereas language now is to get the point across so the maximum number of people can understand it. A key example of this is twitter and its 160 character limit, which will bring in more abbreviations than before or on Facebook, where there isn’t a limit.

LATINATE LEXIS
Religious, medical and language related to law all are mostly Latinate lexis. This is explained by the high level of power that was associated with them and the high level of education that they received.

ANGLO-SAXON LEXIS
Anglo-Saxon lexis has a lot of monosyllabic lexis, and this is often associated with the lack of education they had. However the Anglo-Saxon community communicated mainly for things they needed therefore all that were needed was simple language. Today the majority of our high frequency lexis is Anglo-Saxon and the majority of low frequency lexis is Latinate.

PRESCRIPTIVISM
Believes that language should be ‘pure’ and therefore would be against language change. It rejects non-standard language such as slang and local dialect.

DESCRIPTIVISM
Describes the nature of language change without judgement. Language change is seen as part of the progress of language and that language is worthy of study and recognition wherever it is used. “Language must either evolve or wither away” – Sarah Churchwell, The Guardian.

No comments:

Post a Comment